ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG
1. Introduction
Patients with hypertension are
at an increased risk of myocardial ischaemia through several mechanisms and in
particular through the coexistence of left ventricular hypertrophy and coronary
artery disease (CAD). Angina, myocardial infarction, left ventricular
dysfunction, and sudden death are the principal clinical expressions of CAD.
Left ventricular hypertrophy may itself cause angina and substantially
increases risk of sudden death. In both situations myocardial ischaemia may
also be asymptomatic. This article focuses principally on the management of
hypertension in patients with ischaemic heart disease secondary to obstructive
CAD. Blood pressure levels remain unacceptably high in about half of such
patients in Europe.. An understanding of the
pathophysiology of myocardial ischaemia facilitates better decision making
regarding choice of antihypertensive therapy.
1.2 Pathophysiology
There is a sound
pathophysiological basis for reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients
with ischaemic heart disease. Both elevated systolic blood pressure and left
ventricular hypertrophy have a detrimental effect on myocardial oxygen
requirements. Effective blood pressure control and regression of hypertrophy
will lessen the imbalance between myocardial supply and demand. An ideal
therapeutic regimen would combine drugs that optimize the supply-and-demand
relationship with drugs that reduce cardiovascular events. Decision making
regarding medication in hypertensive patients with CAD can be informed from
hypertension trials, with ischaemic subgroups, and from studies in ischaemic populations,
with hypertensive subgroups. Only one trial has specifically recruited patients
with both conditions. Several agents used in these trials merit further
consideration.
1.3 Target Blood Pressure
Cardiovascular mortality
increases continuously across the full blood pressure range from 115/75 mmHg,
doubling with each increment of 20/10 mmHg. Thresholds guide when to initiate
treatment in low-risk patients. Such arbitrary limits are less relevant once
CAD is established. Lowering blood pressure in these patients reduces
cardiovascular events irrespective of baseline values. As with diabetes, a
target blood pressure of 130/80 mmHg is therefore now recommended.
Blood vessels, vascular smooth
muscle has α2-adrenoceptors that are normally activated by nor epinephrie
released by sympathetic adrenergic nerves or by circulating epinephrine. These
receptors, like those in the heart, are coupled to a Gs-protein, which
stimulates the formation of cAMP. Although increased cAMP enhances cardiac
myocyte contraction, in vascular smooth muscle an increase in cAMP leads to
smooth muscle relaxation. The reason for this is that cAMP inhibits myosin
light chain kinase that is responsible for phosphorylating smooth muscle
myosin. Therefore, increases in -
3 -intracellular cAMP caused by α2-agonists
inhibits myosin light chain kinase thereby producing less contractile force
(i.e., promoting relaxation).
Other tissues. ctivation of α2-adrenoceptors
in the lungs causes bronchodilation. α2-adrenoceptor activation leads to
hepatic glycogenolysis and pancreatic release of glucagon, which increases
plasma glucose concentrations. α1-adrenoceptor stimulation in the kidneys
causes the release of renin, which stimulates the production of angiotensin II
and the subsequent release of aldosterone by the adrenal cortex.
Additional
modifiable risk factors
A small number of modifiable
risk factors account for the majority of cardiovascular risk. Just five risk
factors accounted for 80% of the population-attributable risk: lipids (odds
ratio 3.25), smoking (2.87), diabetes (2.37), hypertension (1.91), and obesity
(1.12). Daily consumption of fruits and vegetables (0.70), regular physical
activity (0.86), and moderate alcohol consumption (0.91) were protective
factors. Physicians frequently underestimate the benefits of smoking cessation,
exercise, and diet. Advice, counselling, and nicotine replacement products are
effective in 25% of smokers .Exercise training improves anginal symptoms,
increases exercise capacity, and reduces myocardial ischaemia .Meta-analysis of
cardiac rehabilitation studies suggests that exercise training reduces
cardiovascular mortality while simultaneously improving blood pressure and
lipid profile. In a recent randomized trial on highly selected patients
,regular physical exercise improved event-free survival compared with
percutaneous intervention.
1.4 Environment
A number of environmental
factors have been implicated in the development of hypertension, including salt
intake, obesity, occupation, alcohol intake, family size, stimulant intake,
excessive noise exposure,and crowding.
Salt sensitivity
Sodium is the environmental
factor that has received the greatest attention. It is to be noted that
approximately 60% of the essential hypertension population is responsive to
sodium intake.
1.5 Role of renin
Renin is an enzyme secreted by
the juxtaglomerular cells of the kidney and linked with aldosterone in a
negative feedback loop.The range of plasma renin activities observed in
hypertensive subjects is broader than in normotensive individuals. In
consequence, some hypertensive patients have been defined as having low-renin
and others as having high-renin essential hypertension.
1.6 Role of
Insulin
Insulin is a polypeptide hormone
secreted by the pancreas. Its main purpose is to regulate the levels of glucose
in the body, it also has some other effects. Insulin resistance and/or
hyperinsulinemia have been suggested as being responsible for the increased
arterial pressure in some patients with hypertension. This feature is now
widely recognized as part of syndrome X, or the metabolic syndrome.
Sleep apnea
Sleep apnea is a common, under
recognized cause of hypertension. It is best treated with weight loss and
nocturnal nasal positive airway pressure.
1.7 Genetics
Hypertension is one of the most
common complex genetic disorders, with genetic heritability averaging 30%. Data
supporting this view emerge from animal studies as well as in population
studies in humans. Most of these studies support the concept that the
inheritance is probably multifactorial or that a number of different genetic
defects each have an elevated blood pressure as one of their phenotypic
expressions.
More than 50 genes have been examined in
association studies with hypertension, and the number is constantly growing.
1.8 Other etiologies
There are some anecdotal or
transient causes of high blood pressure. These are not to be confused with the
disease called hypertension in which there is an intrinsic physiopathological
mechanism as described above.
1.9 secondary hypertension
Only in a small minority of
patients with elevated arterial pressure can a specific cause be identified.
These individuals will probably have an endocrine or renal defect that if
corrected would bring blood pressure back to normal values.
Renal hypertension
Hypertension produced by
diseases of the kidney. A simple explanation for renal vascular hypertension is
that decreased perfusion of renal tissue due to stenosis of a main or branch
renal artery activates the renin-angiotensin system.
Adrenal hypertension
Hypertension is a feature of a
variety of adrenal cortical abnormalities. In primary aldosteronism there is a
clear relationship between the aldosterone-induced sodium retention and the
hypertension.
In patients with
pheochromocytoma increased secretion of catecholamines such as epinephrine and
norepinephrine by a tumor (most often located in the adrenal medulla) causes
excessive stimulation of [adrenergic receptors], which results in peripheral
vasoconstriction and cardiac stimulation. This diagnosis is confirmed by
demonstrating increased urinary excretion of epinephrine and norepinephrine
and/or their metabolites (vanillylmandelic acid).
Diet
Certain medications, especially
NSAIDS (Motrin/ibupofen) and steroids can cause hypertension. Ingestion of
imported licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) can cause secondary hypoaldosteronism,
which itself is a cause of hypertension.
Age
Over time, the number of
collagen fibers in artery and arteriole walls increases, making blood vessels
stiffer. With the reduced elasticity comes a smaller cross-sectional area in
systole, and so a raised mean arterial blood pressure.
1.9.1. Pathophysiology
Most of the secondary mechanisms
associated with hypertension are generally fully understood, and are outlined
at secondary hypertension. However, those associated with essential (primary)
hypertension are far less understood. What is known is that cardiac output is
raised early in the disease course, with total peripheral resistance (TPR)
normal; over time cardiac output drops to normal levels but TPR is increased.
Three theories have been proposed to explain this:
• Inability
of the kidneys to excrete sodium, resulting in natriuretic factors such as
Atrial Natriuretic Factor being secreted to promote salt excretion with the
side-effect of raising total peripheral resistance.
• An
overactive renin / angiotension system leads to vasoconstriction and retention
of sodium and water. The increase in blood volume leads to hypertension.
• An
overactive sympathetic nervous system, leading to increased stress responses.
It is also known that hypertension is highly
heritable and polygenic (caused by more than one gene) and a few candidate
genes have been postulated in the etiology of this condition.
Signs and symptoms
Hypertension is usually found
incidentally - "case finding" - by healthcare professionals. It
normally produces no symptoms.
Malignant hypertension (or accelerated
hypertension) is distinct as a late phase in the condition, and may present
with headaches, blurred vision and end-organ damage.
It is recognised that stressful situations can
increase the blood pressure;
Hypertension is often confused with mental
tension, stress and anxiety. While chronic anxiety is associated with poor
outcomes in people with hypertension, it alone does not cause it.
Hypertensive
urgencies and emergencies
Hypertension is rarely severe
enough to cause symptoms. These typically only surface with a systolic blood
pressure over 240 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure over 120 mmHg. These
pressures without signs of end-organ damage (such as renal failure) are termed
"accelerated" hypertension. When end-organ damage is possible or
already ongoing, but in absence of raised intracranial pressure, it is called
hypertensive emergency. Hypertension under this circumstance needs to be
controlled, but prolonged hospitalization is not necessarily required. When
hypertension causes increased intracranial pressure, it is called malignant
hypertension. Increased intracranial pressure causes papilledema, which is
visible on ophthalmoscopic examination of the retina.
1.10 Complications
While elevated blood pressure alone is not an
illness, it often requires treatment due to its short- and long-term effects on
many organs. The risk is increased for:
• Cerebrovascular accident (CVAs or strokes)
·
Myocardial infarction (heart attack)
• Hypertensive cardiomyopathy (heart failure due
to chronically high blood pressure)
• Hypertensive retinopathy - damage to the retina
• Hypertensive nephropathy - chronic renal
failure due to chronically high blood pressure
1.11 Pregnancy
Main
article: Hypertension of pregnancy
Although few women of
childbearing age have high blood pressure, up to 10% develop hypertension of
pregnancy. While generally benign, it may herald three complications of
pregnancy: pre-eclampsia, HELLP syndrome and eclampsia. Follow-up and control
with medication is therefore often necessary.
1.12 primary vs. secondary hypertension
Once the diagnosis of hypertension has been made
it is important to attempt to exclude or identify reversible (secondary)
causes.
• Over 90% of adult hypertension has no clear
cause and is therefore called essential/primary hypertension. Often, it is part
of the metabolic "syndrome X" in patients with insulin resistance: it
occurs in combination with diabetes mellitus (type 2), combined hyperlipidemia and central obesity.
• In hypertensive children most cases are
secondary hypertension, and the cause should be pursued diligently.
1.13 Investigations commonly performed
in newly diagnosed hypertension
Tests are undertaken to identify
possible causes of secondary hypertension, and seek evidence for end-organ
damage to the heart itself or the eyes (retina) and kidneys. Diabetes and
raised cholesterol levels being additional risk factors for the development of
cardiovascular disease are also tested for as they will also require
management.
• Creatinine
(renal function) - to identify both underlying renal disease as a cause of
hypertension and conversely hypertension causing onset of kidney damage. Also a
baseline for later monitoring the possible side-effects of certain
antihypertensive drugs.
• Electrolytes (sodium, potassium)
• Glucose - to identify diabetes mellitus
• Cholesterol
Additional
tests often include:
• Testing
of urine samples for proteinuria - again to pick up underlying kidney disease
or evidence of hypertensive renal damage.
• Electrocardiogram (EKG/ECG) - for evidence of
the heart being under strain from working against a high blood pressure. Also
may show resulting thickening of the heart muscle (left ventricular
hypertrophy) or of the occurrence of previous silent cardiac disease (either
subtle electrical conduction disruption or even a myocardial infarction).
• Chest X-ray - again for signs of cardiac
enlargement or evidence of cardiac failure.
1.14 Treatment
1.14.1 Lifestyle modification
Doctors recommend weight loss
and regular exercise as the first steps in treating mild to moderate
hypertension. These steps are highly effective in reducing blood pressure,
although most patients with moderate or severe hypertension end up requiring
indefinite drug therapy to bring their blood pressure down to a safe level.
Discontinuing smoking does not directly reduce blood pressure, but is very
important for people with hypertension because it reduces the risk of many
dangerous outcomes of hypertension, such as stroke and heart attack. An
increase in daily calcium intake has also been shown to be highly effective in
reducing blood pressure.
Mild hypertension is usually
treated by diet, exercise and improved physical fitness. A diet rich in fruits
and vegetables and low fat or fat-free dairy foods and moderate or low in
sodium lowers blood pressure in people with hypertension. This diet is known as
the DASH diet (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension). Dietary sodium (salt)
may worsen hypertension in some people and reducing salt intake decreases blood
pressure in a third of people. Many people choose to use a salt substitute to
reduce their salt intake. Regular mild exercise improves blood flow, and helps to
lower blood pressure. In addition, fruits, vegetables, and nuts have the added
benefit of increasing dietary potassium, which offsets the effect of sodium and
acts on the kidney to decrease blood pressure.
Reduction of environmental
stressors such as high sound levels and over-illumination can be an additional
method of ameliorating hypertension. Biofeedback is also used particularly
device guided paced breathing
1.14.2 Medications.
Antihypertensive
There are many classes of
medications for treating hypertension, together called antihypertensives, which
— by varying means — act by lowering blood pressure. Evidence suggests that
reduction of the blood pressure by 5-6 mmHg can decrease the risk of stroke by
40%, of coronary heart disease by 15-20%, and reduces the likelihood of
dementia, heart failure, and mortality from vascular disease.
The aim of treatment should be
blood pressure control to <140/90 mmHg for most patients, and lower in
certain contexts such as diabetes or kidney disease (some medical professionals
recommend keeping levels below 120/80 mmHg). Each added drug may reduce the
systolic blood pressure by 5-10 mmHg, so often multiple drugs are necessary to
achieve blood pressure control.
Commonly
used drugs include:
• ACE
inhibitors such as captopril, enalapril, fosinopril lisinopril (quinapril,
ramipril Angiotensin II receptor antagonists: eg, irbesartan losartan
valsartan,candesartan (
• Alpha blockers such as doxazosin, prazosin, or
terazosin
• Beta blockers such as atenolol, labetalol,
metoprolol propranolol.
• Calcium channel blockers such as amlodipine
,diltiazem, verapamil
• Diuretics: eg, bendroflumethiazide,
chlortalidone, hydrochlorothiazide (also called HCTZ)
• Combination products (which usually contain
HCTZ and one other drug)
Which type of many medications should be used
initially for hypertension has been the subject of several large studies and
various national guidlelines.
The study showed a slightly
better outcome and cost-effectiveness for the thiazide diuretic chlortalidone
compared to anti-hypertensives.Whilst a subsequent smaller study (ANBP2) did
not show this small difference in outcome and actually showed a slightly better
outcome for ACE-inhibitors in older male patients.Whilst thiazides are cheap,
effective, and recommended as the best first-line drug for hypertension by many
experts, they are not prescribed as often as some newer drugs. Arguably, this
is because they are off-patent and thus rarely promoted by the drug industry.Although
physicians may start with non-thiazide antihypertensive medications if there is
a compelling reason to do so. An example is the use of ACE-inhibitors in
diabetic patients who have evidence of kidney disease, as they have been shown
to both reduce blood pressure and slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy.In
patients with coronary artery disease or a history of a heart attack, beta
blockers and ACE-inhibitors both lower blood pressure and protect heart muscle
over a lifetime, leading to reduced mortality.
Conclusion ------------------
The prognosis for patients with
hypertension and ischaemic heart disease is critically dependent on addressing
the three areas of blood pressure lowering, lessening ischaemia, and providing
cardiovascular protection. Many of the commonly used agents have complementary
effects in these areas. All modifiable risk factors must be aggressively
managed. Some cardiologists place more emphasis on the immediate benefits of
percutaneous revascularization. This approach
offers no benefit over conservative medical treatment in terms of death,
myocardial infarction, or subsequent revascularization .The cornerstone of
treatment is blood pressure reduction. Multiple-drug therapy is required using
agents with both antihypertensive and antianginal properties. Combining a
[beta]-blocker with amlodipine is preferable. For [beta]-blocker-intolerant
patients, rate-limiting calcium antagonists are equally effective. ACE
inhibitors are appropriate if blood pressure control remains suboptimal.
Antiplatelet and statin therapy are mandatory in all patients. Compliance is a
major issue and requires support to facilitate understanding of the importance
of lifestyle modifications and drug therapy in reducing risk of future
cardiovascular events. Recent years have seen a marked reduction in
cardiovascular event rates, largely due to these measures. Despite this, basic
cardiovascular risk factors remain underdiagnosed and poorly treated in many
regions of the world .This is unacceptable in the 21st century when there is
such unequivocal benefit in a strategy combining blood pressure control with
vasculoprotective therapies.
The rationale for using
fixed-dose combination therapy is to obtain increased blood pressure control by
employing two antihypertensive agents with different modes of action and to
enhance compliance by using a single tablet that is taken once or twice daily
Using low doses of two different agents can also minimize the clinical and
metabolic effects that occur with maximal dosages of the individual components
of the combined tablet. These potential advantages are such that some
investigators have recommended using combination antihypertensive therapy as
initial treatment, particularly in patients with target-organ damage or more
severe initial levels of hypertension. Combination antihypertensive drugs are
listed in Table .
Combination Drugs for the Treatment of
Hypertension
Diuretic combinations
|
Amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide (5 mg/50 mg)
|
Spironolactone and hydrochlorothiazide (25
mg/50 mg, 50 mg/50 mg)
|
Triamterene and hydrochlorothiazide (37.5 mg/25
mg, 50 mg/25 mg)
|
Triamterene and hydrochlorothiazide (37.5 mg/25
mg, 75 mg/50 mg)
|
Triamterene and hydrochlorothiazide (37.5 mg/25
mg, 75 mg/50 mg)
|
Beta blockers and diuretics
|
Atenolol and chlorthalidone (50 mg/25 mg, 100
mg/25 mg)
|
Bisoprolol and
hydrochlorothiazide (2.5 mg/6.25 mg, 5 mg/6.25 mg, 10 mg/6.5 mg)
|
Metoprolol and
hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg/25 mg, 100 mg/25 mg, 100 mg/50 mg)
|
Nadolol and bendroflumethazide
(40 mg/5 mg, 80 mg/5 mg)
|
Propranolol and
hydrochlorothiazide (40 mg/25 mg, 80 mg/25 mg)
|
|
Propranolol ER and
hydrochlorothiazide (80 mg/50 mg, 120 mg/50 mg, 160 mg/50 mg)
|
Timolol and hydrochlorothiazide
(10 mg/25 mg)
|
Bisoprolol and
hydrochlorothiazide (2.5 mg/6.25 mg, 5 mg/6.25 mg, 10 mg/6.5 mg)
|
ACE inhibitors and diuretics
|
Benazepril and
hydrochlorothiazide (5 mg/6.25 mg, 10 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/25 mg)
|
Captopril and
hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg/15 mg, 25 mg/25 mg, 50 mg/15 mg, 50 mg/25 mg)
|
Enalapril and
hydrochlorothiazide (5 mg/12.5 mg, 10 mg/25 mg)
|
Lisinopril and
hydrochlorothiazide (10 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/25 mg)
|
Lisinopril and
hydrochlorothiazide (10 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/25 mg)
|
Moexipril and
hydrochlorothiazide (7.5 mg/12.5 mg, 15 mg/25 mg)
|
Benazepril and
hydrochlorothiazide (5 mg/6.25 mg, 10 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/25 mg)
|
ACE inhibitors and diuretics
|
Benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide
(5 mg/6.25 mg, 10 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/25 mg)
|
Captopril and
hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg/15 mg, 25 mg/25 mg, 50 mg/15 mg, 50 mg/25 mg)
|
Enalapril and
hydrochlorothiazide (5 mg/12.5 mg, 10 mg/25 mg)
|
Lisinopril and
hydrochlorothiazide (10 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/25 mg)
|
Lisinopril and
hydrochlorothiazide (10 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/25 mg)
|
Moexipril and
hydrochlorothiazide (7.5 mg/12.5 mg, 15 mg/25 mg)
|
Angiotensin-II receptor
antagonists and diuretics
|
Losartan and hydrochlorothiazide
(50 mg/12.5 mg, 100 mg/25 mg)
|
Valsartan and
hydrochlorothiazide (80 mg/12.5 mg, 160 mg/12.5 mg)
|
ACE inhibitors and diuretics
|
Benazepril and
hydrochlorothiazide (5 mg/6.25 mg, 10 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/25 mg)
|
Captopril and hydrochlorothiazide
(25 mg/15 mg, 25 mg/25 mg, 50 mg/15 mg, 50 mg/25 mg)
|
Enalapril and
hydrochlorothiazide (5 mg/12.5 mg, 10 mg/25 mg)
|
Lisinopril and
hydrochlorothiazide (10 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/25 mg)
|
Lisinopril and
hydrochlorothiazide (10 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/12.5 mg, 20 mg/25 mg)
|
Moexipril and
hydrochlorothiazide (7.5 mg/12.5 mg, 15 mg/25 mg)
|
Angiotensin-II receptor
antagonists and diuretics
|
Losartan and
hydrochlorothiazide (50 mg/12.5 mg, 100 mg/25 mg)
|
Valsartan and
hydrochlorothiazide (80 mg/12.5 mg, 160 mg/12.5 mg)
|
Calcium channel blockers and
ACE inhibitors
|
Amlodipine and benazepril (2.5
mg/10 mg, 5 mg/10 mg, 5 mg/20 mg)
|
Diltiazem and enalapril (180
mg/5 mg)
|
Felodipine and enalapril (5
mg/5 mg)
|
Verapamil and trandolapril (180
mg/2 mg, 240 mg/1 mg, 240 mg/2 mg, 240 mg/4 mg)
|
Miscellaneous combinations
|
Clonidine and chlorthalidone
(0.1 mg/15 mg, 0.2 mg/15 mg, 0.3 mg/15 mg)
|
Hydralazine and
hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg/25 mg, 50 mg/50 mg, 100 mg/50 mg)
|
Methyldopa and
hydrochlorothiazide (250 mg/15 mg, 250 mg/25 mg, 500 mg/30 mg, 500 mg/50 mg)
|
Prazosin and polythiazide (1
mg/0.5 mg, 2 mg/0.5 mg, 5 mg/0.5 mg)
|
ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme
|
Diuretics in Combination Antihypertensive
Therapy
Diuretics are effective
antihypertensive drugs. Treatment with a diuretic such as hydrochlorothiazide
results in a dose-dependent blood pressure reduction that levels off with
higher dosages. In long-term trials, diuretics have been shown to reduce the
incidence of stroke, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease and
total mortality from cardiovascular disease.
Unfortunately, the degree of improvement in
cardiovascular mortality is less than would have been expected based on
epidemiologic data. One postulated but not yet proven explanation is that the
higher diuretic dosages used in the large trials cause relative hypokalemia, as
well as increased serum lipid levels, insulin resistance and uric acid levels.
These adverse metabolic effects counteract the positive cardiovascular benefits
of blood pressure reduction. Such effects do not occur when diuretics are
administered in a low dosage, such as 6.25 or 12.5 mg per day of
hydrochlorothiazide.
Because diuretics blunt the
sodium- and water-retaining effects of many other antihypertensive drugs, they
are the most commonly used medication in combination antihypertensive agents.
The JNC VI states clearly, "If a diuretic is not chosen as the first drug,
it is usually indicated as a second-step agent because its addition will
enhance the effects of other agents."
Potassium-Sparingand Thiazide Diuretics
The discrepancy between the JNC
VI recommendations for first-line use of thiazide diuretics and the actual use
of these agents in clinical practice may be attributable to physicians'
concerns about the development of hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia, as well as
the marketing of newer agents by pharmaceutical companies. Combination therapy
with a potassium-sparing diuretic and a thiazide diuretic attempts to reduce
the risk of adverse metabolic effects. Combination therapy does not obviate the
need for serial monitoring of serum electrolyte levels, but it does decrease
the incidence of thiazide-induced hypokalemia without an increased risk of
hyperkalemia.
Fixed-dose potassium-sparingthiazide
diuretic combinations have been in use for more than 20 years. Current
combinations include spironolactone-hydrochlorothiazide (Aldactazide),
triamterene-hydrochlorothiazide (Dyazide, Maxzide) and
amiloride-hydrochlorothiazide (Moduretic). These combination drugs do not
appear to differ significantly in efficacy or adverse effects.13 The
described improvement in the bioavailability of Maxzide over Dyazide has not
been shown to yield improved blood pressure control.
All potassium-sparingthiazide
diuretic combinations seem to reduce blood pressure to the same degree as
thiazide diuretics alone. In one large postmarketing surveillance study of
patients treated with triamterene-hydrochlorothiazide, the incidence of
hypokalemia was approximately one half to one third that expected in
hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy. In addition, the amiloride-hydrochlorothiazide
combination caused significantly less alteration of serum potassium levels than
did hydrochlorothiazide given alone in dosages of 25 to 100 mg per day. The
clinical applicability of the findings may be questionable because the studies
used hydrochlorothiazide dosages that were significantly higher than those
currently recommended.
The low dosages of
hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 25 mg per day) advocated in the JNC VI provide
significant blood pressure reduction while minimizing electrolyte
abnormalities. It remains unclear whether the addition of a potassium-sparing
agent confers additional benefit compared with a low dosage of hydrochlorothiazide
alone.
Diuretics interaction
Thiazide diuretics are a family
of drugs that remove water from the body. They are referred to as
potassium-depleting because they cause the body to lose potassium as well as
water. Potassium-depleting diuretics also cause the body to lose magnesium.
Thiazide diuretics are used to lower blood pressure in people with high blood
pressure. Diuretics are also used to reduce water accumulation caused by other
diseases.
Thiazide diuretics are also combined with other
drugs to treat various conditions.
The information in this article
pertains to thiazide diuretics in general. The interactions reported here may
not apply to all the Also Indexed As terms. Talk to your doctor or pharmacist
if you are taking any of these drugs.
Thiazide Diuretics Interactions with Dietary Supplements
Calcium
Thiazide diuretics decrease
calcium loss in the urine due to actions on the kidneys. As a result, it may be
less important for some people taking thiazide diuretics to supplement calcium
than it is for other people.
Folic acid
One study showed that people
taking diuretics for more than six months had dramatically lower blood levels
of folic acid and higher levels of homocysteine compared with individuals not
taking diuretics. Homocysteine, a toxic amino acid byproduct, has been
associated with atherosclerosis. Until further information is available, people
taking diuretics for longer than six months should probably supplement with
folic acid.
Magnesium and Potassium
Potassium-depleting diuretics,
including thiazide diuretics, cause the body to lose potassium; they may also
cause cellular magnesium depletion, although this deficiency may not be
reflected by a low blood level of magnesium. Magnesium loss induced by potassium-depleting
diuretics can cause additional potassium loss. Until more is known, it has been
suggested that people taking potassium-depleting diuretics, including thiazide
diuretics, should supplement both potassium and magnesium.
Magnesium supplementation for
people taking thiazide diuretics is typically 300–600 mg per day, though higher
amounts (over 800 mg per day) have been reported in a controlled study to
reduce side effects of thiazides. Combining supplementation of both potassium
and magnesium has been reported to correct abnormally low blood levels of
potassium and also to protect against excessive loss of magnesium.
Vitamin D
The reduction in urinary calcium
loss resulting from treatment with thiazide diuretics is due primarily to
changes in kidney function and may also be due, in part, to changes in vitamin
D metabolism. However, there is no evidence to suggest that people taking
diuretics have different requirements for vitamin D.
Sodium
Diuretics,
including thiazide diuretics, cause increased loss of sodium in the urine. By
removing sodium from the body, diuretics also cause water to leave the body.
This reduction of body water is the purpose of taking diuretics. Therefore,
there is usually no reason to replace lost sodium, although strict limitation
of salt intake in combination with the actions of diuretics can sometimes cause
excessive sodium depletion. On the other hand, people who restrict sodium
intake, and in the process reduce blood pressure, may need to have their dose
of diuretics lowered.
Interaction
of angiotensin antagonists
Interaction between the nonpeptide angiotensin antagonist SKF-108,566 and histidine 256 (HisVI:16) of the angiotensin type 1 receptor
His256 (HisVI:16) of
transmembrane segment (TM)-VI of the rat angiotensin type 1 (AT1)
receptor was targeted for mutagenesis to investigate its potential
involvement in ligand binding. Substitution of His256 with alanine,
phenylalanine, glutamine, or isoleucine did not affect the binding of
either angiotensin II or nine different biphenylimidazole AT1 antagonists.
In contrast, the binding affinity of the prototype imidazoleacrylic
acid antagonist SKF-108,566 was reduced 15-fold by the exchange of
His256 with alanine. Substitution of His256 with either isoleucine
or phenylalanine yielded similar results, whereas a glutamine residue
was able to substitute for His256, suggesting that the epsilon-nitrogen
of His256 could be involved in the interaction with the imidazoleacrylic
acid. To identify the chemical groups on SKF-108,566 that interact
with His256 and with Asn295, a previously identified interaction point
for nonpeptide antagonists located in TM-VII, we tested the binding of
15 analogs of SKF-108,566 in which different chemical moieties were systematically
exchanged. The results indicated that the carboxyphenyl group of
SKF-108,566 interacts with the imidazole side chain of His256. The data
did not point to any particular contact group on the antagonist for Asn295.
It is concluded that the imidazoleacrylic acid antagonists share some
interactions in TM-VII of the AT1 receptor with the biphenylimidazole antagonists,
but the binding of the imidazoleacrylic acid compounds is uniquely
dependent on His256 in TM-VI, possibly through the carboxyphenyl moiety.
[beta]-Blockers
These drugs are not used alone in case of
Hypertension but can use in the combination with diuretics.
[beta]-Blockers
decrease myocardial oxygen demand through reductions in heart rate, blood
pressure, and myocardial contractility. The American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association guidelines endorse [beta]-blockers as first-line therapy for
chronic stable angina, advocating calcium channel blockers only when
[beta]-blockers are contraindicated, poorly tolerated, or unsuccessful (all
class I recommendations) .The guidance extrapolates from three bodies of
evidence: early, small, short-term studies in stable angina; robust postinfarct
reductions in hard endpoints; and purported benefits in hypertension .The
former greatly underrepresents the newer long-acting calcium channel blockers,
as exemplified by amlodipine. The latter is highly questionable .Even the
postinfarct evidence may lack relevance in the modern era. What of the low-risk
patient with a minimal troponin rise, preserved systolic function, and stable occasional
exertional angina? No antianginal agents, including [beta]-blockers, reduce
cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction in patients with stable angina.
All decrease frequency of angina and prolong exercise duration before onset of
symptoms or ST segment depression .None has proven superiority.
Meta-analysis of
90 randomized controlled trials
comparing antianginal agents revealed similar reductions in cardiac
events, anginal symptoms, and time to ischaemia. Only a handful of studies,
however, used newer drugs such as amlodipine (n = 1), bisoprolol (n = 2), or
carvedilol (n = 2), limiting applicability to modern practice. The
International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST) ,the only trial to recruit
patients with both hypertension and CAD, confirmed the equivalence of
verapamil–trandolapril and atenolol–hydrochlorothiazide based strategies in
preventing death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (adjusted hazards ratio 0.98
[0.91–1.07], P = 0.69). Though the study sought to compare multidrug regimens,
open blinding and use of ACE inhibitors and diuretics in both arms served to
attenuate differences between the two strategies. In the respective groups,
81.5% of patients received verapamil vs. 77.5% atenolol, 82.0 vs. 71.6%
received an ACE inhibitor, and 63.0 vs. 81.4% a diuretic at 24 months.
Conclusions regarding the contribution of any single agent are not possible.
Both groups achieved similar blood pressure reduction (18.7/10.0 vs. 19.0/10.2
mmHg) and number of patients reaching Joint National Committee on Hypertension
VI blood pressure targets (71.7 vs. 70.7%, P = 0.18). This corresponded with
marked decreases in the prevalence of angina in both verapamil-based and
atenolol-based groups, from 66.2 and 67.0% to 27.3 and 28.3%, respectively. The
message is clear. Blood pressure reduction is the key, with no evidence of
[beta]-blocker superiority.
In the
Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial – Blood Pressure Lowering Arm
(ASCOT-BPLA) ,the amlodipine–perindopril strategy reduced cardiovascular mortality
and major cardiovascular events, particularly stroke, compared with the
atenolol–bendroflumethiazide regimen. Subsequent meta-analysis suggested that
[beta]-blockers reduce risk of stroke in primary hypertension by about half
that expected (only 19%), the risk being 16% higher than for other drugs.
Patients with coexistent CAD are unlikely to differ. Despite this,
[beta]-blockers have one undeniable advantage as first-line agents over
rate-limiting calcium antagonists in these patients. They may be combined with
newer non-rate-limiting calcium antagonists, notably amlodipine, to provide
dual antianginal and antihypertensive therapy.
In a
meta-analysis of 31 randomized trials involving nearly 25 000 patients,
long-term [beta]-blockade following myocardial infarction significantly reduced
mortality and reinfarction by about 25%, with no such benefits observed in
short-term trials. The recent Clopidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial
Infarction Trial (COMMIT) in more than
45 000 patients, 43% with known
hypertension, reinforces this evidence and guides the timing of initiation.
Immediate intravenous then oral metoprolol until discharge failed to reduce
overall risk of death, reinfarction, or cardiac arrest following acute
myocardial infarction. Early increased risk of cardiogenic shock (days 0–1)
counterbalanced reduced risk of reinfarction and ventricular fibrillation
(significant from day 2 onwards). Consequently the effect of metoprolol on the
combined efficacy and safety outcome of death, reinfarction, arrest, or shock
was adverse initially and beneficial thereafter (P = 0.0003 for trend in odds
ratio). Systolic blood pressure lower than 120 mmHg, and to a lesser extent 160
mmHg or higher, increased the risk of cardiogenic shock with metoprolol. Conservative
blood pressure reduction that avoids coronary hypoperfusion is critical in the
acute situation. [beta]-Blockers should be commenced only once a patient's
haemodynamic condition has stabilized, even in those with hypertension or
tachycardia.
Beta Blockers and Diuretics
Beta blockers cause retention of
sodium and water. Diuretics can cause mild volume reduction that leads to an
increase in renin secretion by the kidney. The rationale for combining beta
blockers with diuretics is twofold: beta blockers blunt the increase in the
plasma renin level that is induced by diuretics, and diuretics decrease the
sodium and water retention that is caused by beta blockers. The combination of
a beta blocker and a diuretic produces additive effects compared with monotherapy
using either agent alone. A recent study assessed the safety and efficacy of
antihypertensive therapy using the cardioselective beta blocker bisoprolol
alone and in combination with low dosages of hydrochlorothiazide. The dosages
of bisoprolol were 2.5, 5 and 10 mg per day. The hydrochlorothiazide dosages
were 6.25 and 25 mg per day. The study showed that monotherapy with either
agent was more effective than placebo, but that when combination therapy was
used, the beneficial effects were greater than when either agent was used alone
.In the same study, combination therapy was associated with a low incidence of
adverse effects. Side effects for combined hydrochlorothiazide in a dosage of
6.5 mg per day and bisoprolol in all dosages included fatigue (9 percent of
recipients), dizziness (6 percent), somnolence (3 percent), impotence (2
percent) and diarrhea (4 percent). When used in combination with bisoprolol,
hydrochlorothiazide (6.25 mg) did not cause hypokalemia or any adverse effects
on the lipid profile. Side effects increased with the use of higher dosages of
bisoprolol or hydrochlorothiazide. The incidence of hypokalemia and
hyperuricemia was greater for 25 mg per day of hydrochlorothiazide than for
6.25 mg per day. With higher bisoprolol dosages, the frequency and severity of
asthenia, diarrhea, dyspepsia and somnolence increased significantly.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
In animal
models, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors modulate atherosclerotic
pathways by inhibition of angiotensin II formation, bradykinin potentiation,
and increased nitric oxide production .Whether this translates into clinical
benefits, providing vasculoprotective effects beyond blood pressure reduction,
is unclear .Even the renoprotective effects are now under debate .The Heart
Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE), study demonstrated that ramipril reduced
morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease or
diabetes plus one additional risk factor. Risk reduction was about three times
greater than predicted for the modest reduction in blood pressure (3.3/1.4
mmHg) ,the difference being attributed to antiatherogenic effects. The HOPE
protocol uniquely administered study medication at bedtime, however. Blood
pressure measurement approximately 10–18 hours later therefore missed the peak
effect after 3–6 hours. A substudy revealed far greater 24-hour ambulatory
blood pressure reduction (10/4 mmHg), particularly marked overnight (17/8
mmHg).
The European
Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery
Disease (EUROPA) studied the effect of perindopril in a low-risk population
with predominantly asymptomatic stable CAD. Risk of the composite primary
outcome was significantly reduced, largely powered by a reduction in myocardial
infarction. No significant difference was observed in cardiovascular or total
mortality, however. The results suggested that 50 patients need to be treated
for 4 years to prevent one major cardiovascular event.
In contrast to
HOPE and EUROPA, addition of an ACE inhibitor to modern conventional therapy
provided no further benefit in the recent Prevention of Events with Angiotensin
Converting Enzyme Inhibition (PEACE) trial ,despite reducing blood pressure by
3.0/he 1.2 mmHg relative to placebo. There are several reasons for these
surprising results..
cardiovascular
event rate was substantially lower than in previous trials due to exclusion of
significant left ventricular systolic dysfunction, prior coronary
revascularization, and more intensive medical therapy. Though nearly half of
patients had a history of hypertension, mean baseline systolic blood pressure
was 133 mmHg, the level achieved using an ACE inhibitor in both HOPE and
EUROPA. The higher prevalence of lipid-lowering therapy compared with previous
trials, and consequently lower serum cholesterol levels, may also lessen the
potential antiatherogenic benefits of ACE inhibition .Finally, significantly
fewer patients were receiving maximum-dose ACE inhibitor after 3 years (57.8%)
[12•] than in HOPE and EUROPA (70.9 and 74%, respectively). The routine use of
ACE inhibitors in patients with hypertension and CAD is therefore no longer
advocated, provided blood pressure, cardiovascular risk factors, and symptoms
are controlled.
Ace Inhibitors and Diuretics
Angiotensin-converting enzyme
(ACE) inhibitors are among the best tolerated antihypertensive drugs and have
been used extensively as initial agents in the treatment of hypertension. The
JNC VI1 recommends ACE inhibitors as second-line agents in most
patients with hypertension and as first-line choices only in selected patients,
including those with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and those with
diabetes and microalbuminuria or proteinuria.
The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
axis is important in the maintenance of systemic blood pressure. By causing
volume and sodium depletion, thiazide diuretics stimulate the production of
renin and angiotensin. This leads to a relative increase in blood pressure and
sodium retention, which counteracts some of the other antihypertensive effects
of the thiazide diuretics. ACE inhibitors interfere with the conversion of
angiotensin I to angiotensin II and thereby decrease angiotensin II levels.
These effects lead to decreased sodium retention and an enhanced
antihypertensive effect.
Synergism between ACE inhibitors
and diuretics is especially prominent in black patients, a population in whom
monotherapy with ACE inhibitors has been shown to be less effective than it is
in white patients. One small study of black patients with hypertension (N = 38)
compared monotherapy using 20 mg per day of enalapril with combination therapy
consisting of 20 mg of enalapril plus 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide per day.
Combination therapy significantly reduced systolic, diastolic and 24-hour
ambulatory blood pressure measurements compared with monotherapy. Combination
therapy controlled blood pressure to a level of less than 140/90 mm Hg in 74
percent of patients.
Studies have shown that ACE
inhibitor diuretic combinations achieve blood pressure control in
approximately 80 percent of patients. Typical results were obtained in one of
the larger double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.
In this study, 505 patients with
diastolic blood pressures of 100 to 114 mm Hg received placebo, lisinopril (10
mg per day), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 or 25 mg per day) or the combination of
lisinopril (10 mg per day) and hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 or 25 mg per day). All
drug therapies were more effective than placebo in lowering blood pressure, but
the combination antihypertensive therapies produced the greatest effect .
No significant differences in blood
pressure reduction were observed for the two dosages of hydrochlorothiazide,
whether the drug was used alone or in a combination. Adverse metabolic effects
were observed only for regimens containing hydrochlorothiazide in a dosage of
25 mg per day. Serum potassium levels were significantly lower only for
monotherapy with 25 mg per day of hydrochlorothiazide. Serum glucose measurements
increased with the 25-mg dosage used as monotherapy or in combination with
lisinopril.
The study found that the
combination consisting of 10 mg per day of lisinopril and 12.5 mg per day of
hydrochlorothiazide was well tolerated. The most commonly observed side effects
were pharyngitis (14 percent of recipients), increased cough (6 percent),
dizziness (2 percent), headache (12 percent) and asthenia (4 percent). Cough
was the only side effect that was more prevalent in this group than in the
placebo group.
Based on this large study,
antihypertensive drug combinations containing an ACE inhibitor and a lower dose
of hydrochlorothiazide are more desirable. It is important to be aware that the
doses of ACE inhibitor in the antihypertensive drug combinations do not reach
the target doses of ACE inhibitors recommended for the treatment of congestive
heart failure, which may be a limitation in these patients.
Angiotensin-II
Antagonists and Diuretics
In patients for whom ACE
inhibitor diuretic combinations are indicated but not tolerated because of
cough, angiotensin-II receptor antagonistdiuretic combinations are available.
Angiotensin-II receptor antagonists work by blocking specific angiotensin II
subtype I, thereby selectively inhibiting the vasoactive properties of
angiotensin II.
Calcium channel blockers
Two recent
studies support the use of dihydropyridine (non-rate-limiting) calcium channel
blockers in CAD. ACTION (A Coronary Disease Trial Investigating Outcome with
Nifedipine GITS [gastrointestinal therapeutic system]) studied the effects of
nifedipine in 7665 patients with treated stable angina pectoris, finding no
reduction in the primary composite endpoint. In the prespecified hypertensive
subgroup (52%) with blood pressure above 140/90 mmHg, however, nifedipine
improved major cardiovascular event-free survival by 13% (P < 0.05),
principally due to reductions in coronary angiography, stroke, and new overt
heart failure .The concurrent blood pressure reduction (6.6/3.5 mmHg)
highlights the importance of improving control in patients with established
CAD.
The Comparison
of Amlodipine Versus Enalapril to Limit Occurrences of Thrombosis (CAMELOT)
compared the effects of amlodipine, enalapril, and placebo in 1991 patients
with angiographic CAD. Although 60.5% of patients had documented hypertension,
mean baseline blood pressure was normal (129/78 mmHg) due to exclusion of
patients with diastolic pressure above 100 mmHg. Amlodipine significantly
reduced the primary composite endpoint of major cardiovascular events relative
to placebo (0.69 [0.54–0.88], P = 0.003), largely due to fewer hospitalizations
for angina and coronary revascularization procedures. Despite almost identical
blood pressure reductions, enalapril failed to significantly reduce the primary
or secondary outcomes. An intravascular ultrasound substudy demonstrated a
trend toward less progression of atherosclerosis in the amlodipine group, which
was significant in those with systolic blood pressures above the mean (P =
0.02). The CAMELOT study provides two important insights. Firstly, ACE
inhibition offered no specific vasculoprotective effects beyond an active
comparator. Secondly, though the two cannot be directly linked, fewer
cardiovascular events occurred alongside lowering of blood pressure already
considered within normal limits. In the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term
Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial ,nearly half of patients had verified coronary
disease. Compared with valsartan, amlodipine reduced blood pressure more
effectively and significantly reduced risk of myocardial infarction and
frequency of angina. Together these studies form a compelling argument for
including amlodipine in treating patients with both hypertension and CAD.
Calcium Channel Blockers and ACE Inhibitors
The combination of a calcium
channel blocker and an ACE inhibitor is appealing on theoretic grounds.
Although calcium antagonists exert much of their antihypertensive effect
through a vasodilatory action, they also have diuretic and natriuretic
properties. ACE inhibitors blunt the stimulation of the
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis that may result from this diuretic effect.
These agents also inhibit the central sympathetic stimulation that may result
from calcium antagonistassociated vasodilatation, although both classes of
drugs are potent vasodilators. ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers work
effectively in combination to lower blood pressure. In one representative
study, diastolic blood pressures were reduced by 3.6 mm Hg more with a
trandolapril-verapamil combination than with monotherapy using either agent. No
increase in side effects was observed for treatment with combined trandolapril
and verapamil.
Calcium antagonists and ACE
inhibitors may also work together to favorably influence target-organ disease
independent of their effect on blood pressure. Together they appear to have a
renal-protective effect, to promote reduction of left ventricular mass and to
decrease mediators of vascular disease. The relatively low dose of ACE
inhibitor in some combinations may not confer the same degree of renal or
cardiac protection that has been demonstrated for higher doses.
Calcium channel blockerACE
inhibitor combinations may result in fewer or milder side effects than occur
with either agent alone. The addition of an ACE inhibitor to therapy with a
dihydropyridine calcium antagonist significantly reduces the incidence of
peripheral edema and reflex tachycardia. Neither class of medications has
prominent metabolic side effects, an advantage in patients with diabetes and
renal disease.
Four fixed-dose combinations of
calcium channel blockers and ACE inhibitors are currently available in the United States.
These combinations have yet to be proved more efficacious than antihypertensive
combinations containing diuretics.
Miscellaneous Combination Agents
Other combination
antihypertensive agents that have existed for many years include diuretics with
a direct-acting vasodilator (hydralazine-hydrochlorothiazide [Apresazide]), a
central alpha-adrenergic agonist (methyldopa-hydrochlorothiazide [Aldoril] and
clonidine-chlorthalidone [Combipres]) or a peripheral alpha-adrenergic blocker
(prazosin-polythiazide [Minizide]). No trials have indicated survival benefit
with their use.
The JNC VI specifically mentioned that the three
nondiuretic classes represented in these combinations "are not well suited
for initial monotherapy because they produce annoying adverse effects in many
patients. No studies have provided conclusive evidence of increased
tolerance when these agents are taken orally in combination with a diuretic.
Therefore, these combinations are not indicated for first-line therapy.
Final Comment
The JNC VI1 continues
to recommend monotherapy with a diuretic or beta blocker as initial treatment
for the undifferentiated patient with hypertension. At the same time, it is
recognized that monotherapy will not provide adequate blood pressure control in
a large proportion of patients, and that many patients will experience
unacceptable side effects with higher dosages of a single agent. Fixed-dose
combination antihypertensive medications are a useful and appropriate treatment
option in this large group of patients.
Central sympatholytics
OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic interactions
between antipsychotics and antihypertensive and to provide recommendations for
the selection of antihypertensive in patients receiving antipsychotic therapy.
DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search of the English-language literature was used to
identify pertinent human and animal studies, reviews, and case reports. STUDY
SELECTION: All available sources were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Background
information was obtained from comprehensive reviews. Individual case reports
were assimilated, and pertinent data were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Because
hypertension is common in patients with psychiatric illness and
antihypertensive agents are used for a multiplicity of indications, significant
numbers of patients receive concurrent therapy with antihypertensives and
antipsychotics. Many antipsychotics may block the antihypertensive efficacy of
guanethidine and related drugs. The interaction between clonidine and
antipsychotics is defined less clearly. Limited data suggest possible additive
hypotensive effects when chlorpromazine and methyldopa are given in
combination. Increased plasma concentrations of thioridazine with a resultant
increase in adverse effects have been reported when propranolol or pindolol are
added to the regimen. A similar increase in chlorpromazine concentrations has
been reported when propranolol was added. Although there are no reports
documenting an interaction between a calcium-channel antagonist and an
antipsychotic, the possible inhibition of oxidative metabolism of
antipsychotics, additive calcium-blocking activity, and additive
pharmacodynamic effects are theorized. Hypotension and postural syncope were
reported in a patient given therapeutic dosages of chlorpromazine and
captopril, and in 2 patients when clozapine was added to enalapril therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: No antipsychotic-antihypertensive combination is absolutely
contraindicated, but no combination should be considered to be completely
without risk. Antihypertensives with no centrally acting activity, such as
diuretics, may be the least likely to result in adverse reactions. The
combination of the beta-antagonists propranolol or pindolol with thioridazine
or
chlorpromazine should be avoided
if possible. Scrupulous patient monitoring for attenuated or enhanced activity
of either agent is essential whenever antipsychotics and antihypertensives are
given concurrently
ACE inhibitor
Captopril, the first ACE
inhibitor
|
Clinical use
Indications for ACE inhibitors include:
- Prevention of cardiovascular disorders
- Congestive heart failure
- Hypertension
- Left ventricular dysfunction
- Prevention of nephropathy in diabetes mellitus
In several of these indications,
ACE inhibitors are used first-line as several agents in the class have been
clinically shown to be superior to other classes of drugs in the reduction of
morbidity and mortality.
ACE inhibitors are often
combined with diuretics in the control of hypertension (usually a thiazide),
when an ACE inhibitor alone proves insufficient; and in chronic heart failure
(usually furosemide) for improved symptomatic control. Thus there exists, on
the market, combination products combining an ACE inhibitor with a thiazide
(usually hydrochlorothiazide) in a single tablet to allow easy administration
by patients.
The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System
This system is activated in
response to hypotension, decreased sodium delivery, decreased blood volume and
sympathetic stimulation. In such a situation, the kidneys release renin which
cleaves the liver derived angiotensinogen into Angiotensin I. Angiotensin I is
then converted to angiotensin II via the angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) in
the pulmonary circulation. The system in general aims to increase blood
pressure.
Effects of ACE
inhibitors
ACE inhibitors lower arteriolar
resistance and increase venous capacitance; increase cardiac output and cardiac
index, stroke work and volume, lower renovascular resistance, and lead to
increased natriuresis (excretion of sodium in the urine).
Normally,angiotensin II will have the following
effects:
-Vasoconstriction (narrowing of blood vessels).
-cardiac hypertrophy.
- stimulate the adrenal cortex to release
aldosterone, a hormone which acts on kidney tubules to retain sodium and
chloride ions and excrete potassium. Sodium is a "water-holding"
molecule, so water is also retained. This leads to increased blood volume,
hence an increase in blood pressure.
- stimulate the posterior pituitary into
releasing vasopressin (also known as anti-diuretic hormone (ADH)) which also
acts on the kidneys to increase water retention.
With ACE inhibitor use, the effects of
angiotensin II are prevented, leading to decreased blood pressure.
Epidemiological and clinical studies have shown
that ACE inhibitors reduce the progress of diabetic nephropathy independently
from their blood pressure-lowering effect. This action of ACE inhibitors is
utilised in the prevention of diabetic renal failure.
ACE inhibitors have been shown
to be effective for indications other than hypertension even in patients with
normal blood pressure. The use of a maximum dose of ACE inhibitors in such
patients (including for prevention of diabetic nephropathy, congestive heart
failure, prophylaxis of cardiovascular events) is justified because it improves
clinical outcomes, independent of the blood pressure lowering effect of ACE
inhibitors. Such therapy, of course, requires careful and gradual titration of
the dose to prevent the patient suffering from the effects of rapidly
decreasing their blood pressure (dizziness, fainting, etc).
Adverse effects
Common adverse drug reactions
(≥1% of patients) include: hypotension, cough, hyperkalemia, headache,
dizziness, fatigue, nausea, renal impairment. A persistent dry cough is a
relatively common adverse effect believed to be associated with the increases
in bradykinin levels produced by ACE inhibitors, although the role of
bradykinin in producing these symptoms remains disputed by some authors.
Patients who experience this cough are often switched to angiotensin II
receptor antagonists.
Rash and taste disturbances,
infrequent with most ACE inhibitors, are more prevalent in captopril and is
attributed to its sulfhydryl moiety. This has led to decreased use of captopril
in clinical setting, although it is still used in scintigraphy of the kidney.
Renal impairment is a
significant adverse effect of all ACE inhibitors, and is associated with their
effect on angiotensin II-mediated homeostatic functions such as renal
bloodflow. ACE inhibitors can induce or exacerbate renal impairment in patients
with renal artery stenosis. This is especially a problem if the patient is also
concomitantly taking an NSAID and a diuretic - the so-called "triple
whammy" effect - such patients are at very high risk of developing renal
failureSome patients develop angioedema due to increased bradykinin levels.
There appears to be a genetic predisposition towards this adverse effect in
patients who degrade bradykinin slower than average.
Examples of ACE inhibitors
ACE inhibitors can be divided into three groups
based on their molecular structure.
Sulfhydryl-containing ACE inhibitors
- Captopril
Dicarboxylate-containing ACE inhibitors
This is the largest group, including:
- Enalapril Ramipril Quinapril Perindopril Lisinopril Benazepril Phosphonate-containing ACE inhibitors
- Fosinopril the only member
Naturally occurring
Casokinins and lactokinins are
breakdown products of casein and whey that occur naturally after ingestion of
milk products, especially sour milk. Their role in blood pressure control is
uncertain.
Comparative information
Comparatively, all ACE
inhibitors have similar antihypertensive efficacy when equivalent doses are
administered. The main point-of-difference lies with captopril, the first ACE
inhibitor, which has a shorter duration of action and increased incidence of
certain adverse effects (cf. captopril).
Certain agents in the ACE
inhibitor class have been proven, in large clinical studies, to reduce
mortality post-myocardial infarction, prevent development of heart failure, etc. While these effects are likely
to be class-effects, good evidence-based medicine practice would direct the use
of those agents with established clinical efficacy.
Contraindications and precautions
The ACE inhibitors are contraindicated in
patients with:
- Previous angioedema associated with ACE inhibitor therapy
- Renal artery stenosis (bilateral, or unilateral with a solitary functioning kidney)
ACE inhibitors should be used with caution in
patients with:
- Impaired renal function
- Aortic valve stenosis or cardiac outflow obstruction
- Hypovolaemia or dehydration
- Haemodialysis with high flux polyacrylonitrile membranes
ACE inhibitors are ADEC
Pregnancy category D, and should be avoided in women who are likely to become
pregnant. In the U.S.,
ACE inhibitors are required to be labelled with a "black box" warning
concerning the risk of birth defects when taking during the second and third
trimester. It has also been found that use of ACE inhibitors in the first
trimester is also associated with a risk of major congenital malformations,
particularly affecting the cardiovascular and central nervous systemsPotassium
supplementation should be used with caution and under medical supervision owing
to the hyperkalaemic effect of ACE inhibitors.
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists
ACE inhibitors share many common
characteristics with another class of cardiovascular drugs called angiotensin
II receptor antagonists, which are often used when patients are intolerant of
the adverse effects produced by ACE inhibitors. ACE inhibitors do not
completely prevent the formation of angiotensin II, as there are other
conversion pathways, and so angiotensin II receptor antagonists may be useful
because they act to prevent the action of angiotensin II at the AT1
receptor.
Use in combination with ACE inhibitors
While counterintuitive at first
glance, the combination therapy of angiotensin II receptor antagonists with ACE
inhibitors may be superior to either agent alone. This combination may increase
levels of bradykinin while blocking the generation of angiotensin II and its
activity at the AT1 receptor. This 'dual blockade' may be more
effective than using an ACE inhibitor alone, because angiotensin II can be
generated via non-ACE-dependent pathways. Preliminary studies suggest that this
combination of pharmacologic agents may be advantageous in the treatment of
essential hypertension, chronic heart failure, and nephropathy. However, more
studies are needed to confirm these highly preliminary results. While
statistically significant results have been obtained for its role in treating
hypertension, clinical significance may be lacking.
Patients with heart failure may benefit from the
combination in terms of reducing morbidity and ventricular remodeling.
The most compelling evidence has
been found for the treatment of nephropathy: this combination therapy partially
reversed the proteinuria and also exhibited a renoprotective effect in patients
afflicted with diabetic nephropathy, and pediatric IgA nephropathy
Ace
Inhibitor Interaction
Blockade of the renin-angiotensin
system improves morbidity and mortality of patients with cardiovascular
diseases, e.g. arterial hypertension, renal failure, following myocardial
infarction and in congestive heart failure. The angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1))
receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers; ARBs), i.e. losartan,
eprosartan, irbesartan and valsartan were developed by computer-based molecule
design. Early observations already indicate that the ARBs elicit pleiotropic
effects developing anti-aggregatory, anti-inflammatory and anti-mitogenic
effects independent from their actions at the AT(1) receptor. Losartan
metabolism indicates a number of known active intermediates and pointed to
further interactions of these derivatives with other receptors and cellular signaling
systems. Here we discuss a compilation of detailed pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic data of active metabolites of ARBs indicating their mode of
action and suggest novel therapeutic implications. The clinical observations
that ARBs elicit potencies in patients with cardiovascular diseases via the
regulation of inflammatory, growth and homeostatic factors lead us to focus on
specific, reactive metabolites, which hold potential for future indications and
possible drug interactions in card.
Adrenergic Receptor Antagonists
(Sympatholytic Drugs)
Beta-Adrenoceptor
Agonists (α-agonists)


General
Pharmacology
Beta-adrenoceptor agonists (α-agonists)
bind to α-receptors on cardiac and smooth muscle tissues. They also have
important actions in other tissues, especially bronchial smooth muscle
(relaxation), the liver (stimulate glycogenolysis) and kidneys.
Beta-adrenoceptors normally bind to norepinephrine released by sympathetic
adrenergic nerves, and to circulating epinephrine. Therefore, α-agonists mimic
the actions of sympathetic adrenergic stimulation acting through α-adrenoceptors.
Overall, the effect of α-agonists is cardiac stimulation (increased heart rate,
contractility, conduction velocity, relaxation) and systemic vasodilation. Arterial
pressure may increase, but not necessarily because the fall in systemic
vascular resistance offsets the increase in cardiac output. Therefore, the
effect on arterial pressure depends on the relative influence on cardiac versus
vascular α-adrenoceptors. α-agonists cause α-receptor down-regulation, which
limits their therapeutic efficacy to short-term application. Beta-agonists,
because they are catecholamines, have a low bioavailability and therefore must
be given by intravenous infusion.
Heart.
Beta-agonists bind to
beta-adrenoceptors located in cardiac nodal tissue, the conducting system, and
contracting myocytes. The heart has both α1 and α2 adrenoceptors, although the
predominant receptor type in number and function is α1. These receptors
primarily bind norepinephrine that is released from sympathetic adrenergic
nerves. Additionally, they bind norepinephrine and epinephrine that circulate
in the blood.
Beta-adrenoceptors are coupled
to a Gs-proteins, which activate adenylyl cyclase to form cAMP from ATP.
Increased cAMP activates a cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PK-A) that
phosphorylates L-type calcium channels, which causes increased calcium entry
into the cells. Increased calcium entry during action potentials leads to
enhanced release of calcium by the sarcoplasmic reticulum in the heart; these
actions increase inotropy (contractility). Gs-protein activation also increases
heart rate by opening ion channels responsible for pacemaker currents in the
sinoatrial node. PK-A phosphorylates sites on the sarcoplasmic reticulum, which
enhances the release of calcium through the ryanodine receptors
(ryanodine-sensitive, calcium-release channels) associated with the
sarcoplasmic reticulum. This provides more calcium for binding the troponin-C,
which enhances inotropy.Finally, PK-A can phosphorylate myosin light chains,
which may also contribute to the positive inotropic effect of beta-adrenoceptor
stimulation. In summary, the cardiac effects of a α-agonist are increased heart
rate, contractility, conduction velocity, and relaxation rate. Blood vessels, Vascular smooth muscle has α2-adrenoceptors
that are normally activated by norepinephrine released by sympathetic
adrenergic nerves or by circulating epinephrine. These receptors, like those in
the heart, are coupled to a Gs-protein, which stimulates the formation of cAMP.
Although increased cAMP enhances cardiac myocyte contraction (see above), in
vascular smooth muscle an increase in cAMP leads to smooth muscle relaxation.
The reason for this is that cAMP inhibits myosin light chain kinase that is
responsible for phosphorylating smooth muscle myosin. Therefore, increases in
intracellular cAMP caused by α2-agonists inhibits myosin light chain kinase
thereby producing less contractile force (i.e., promoting relaxation).
Other tissues, α activation of α2-adrenoceptors
in the lungs causes bronchodilation. α2-adrenoceptor activation leads to
hepatic glycogenolysis and pancreatic release of glucagon, which increases
plasma glucose concentrations. α1-adrenoceptor stimulation in the kidneys
causes the release of renin, which stimulates the production of angiotensin II
and the subsequent release of aldosterone by the adrenal cortex.
Specific
Drugs and Therapeutic Uses
There are several different α-agonists
that are used clinically for the treatment of heart failure or circulatory
shock, all of which are either natural catecholamines or analogs. Nearly all
of these α-agonists, however, have some degree of α-agonist activity. These
drugs along with their agonist properties are given in the table below. Note
that for some of the drugs the receptor selectivity is highly dose-dependent.Drug
|
Receptor Selectivity
|
Clinical Use
|
Comments
|
Epinephrine
|
α1 α α2 > α 1*
= α
2*
|
Anaphylactic shock; cardiogenic
shock; cardiac arrest
|
Low doses produce cardiac
stimulation and vasodilation, which turns to vasoconstriction at high doses.
*At high plasma concentrations, =αselectivity.
|
Norepinephrine
|
α1 α αα1α
α2 =α2 |
Severe hypotension; septic
shock
|
Reflex bradycardia masks direct
stimulatory effects on sinoatrial node.
|
Dopamine
|
α1αα2 >α1*
|
–Acute
heart failure, cardiogenic shock and acute renal failure
|
Biosynthetic precursor of
norepinephrine; stimulates norepinephrine release. *At low doses, it
stimulates the heart and decreases systemic vascular resistance; at high
doses, vasodilation becomes vasoconstriction as lower affinity α -receptors
bind to the dopamine α also binds to D1 receptors in kidney, producing
vasodilation.
|
Dobutamine
|
α1 α α2 >
α 1
|
Acute heart failure;
cardiogenic shock; refractory heart failure
|
Net effect is cardiac
stimulation with modest vasodilation.
|
Isoproterenol
|
α1αα2
|
Bradycardia and atrioventricular
block
|
Net effect is cardiac
stimulation and vasodilation with little change in pressure.
|
Side
Effects and Contraindications
A major side effect of α-agonists
is cardiac arrhythmia. Because these drugs increase myocardial oxygen demand,
they can precipitate angina in patients with coronary artery disease. Headache
and tremor are also common.
Definition: Drugs that decrease
sympathetic neuronal activity
Classification according to mechanism of
action:
1. Indirect-acting:
- Drugs that interfere with sympathetic neuronal function by inhibiting:
a)Synthesis of NE
b) Storage of NE
c) Release of NE-used mainly to treat hypertension
2. Direct-acting:
- Adrenergic
Receptor Antagonists: -drugs that bind to adrenergic
receptors but don't activate themIncludes:
a) α receptor blocking drugs: treatment of hypertension (limited use)
b) α receptor blocking drugs: treatment of cardiovascular disorders (widely used) - nonselective: block both α1 & α2 receptors
- selective: block either α1 or α2 receptors
Pre- and post-junctional sites of action of
sympatholytic drugs
![]() |
Figure Legend:
1. Inhibition of synthesis of
NE
eg. 1a, alpha-methyltyrosine
eg. 1b, carbidopa eg. 1c, disulfiram
2. Disruption of vesicular
storage of NE
eg. reserpine
3. Inhibit release of NE
eg. guanethidine
4. Alpha & beta receptor
antagonists
eg. phentolamine
eg. propranolol |
Prejunctional autoreceptors: α 2 subtype
are activated by NE (or agonists) ----> decrease release of NE
.: inhibitory autoreceptor mechanism regulates
neurotransmitter release
i)
Inhibit synthesis of NE
a)
Metyrosine
-inhibits tyrosine hydroxylase ----> decreased
dopamine, NE & EP.
Used in patients with pheochromocytoma (tumor of the adrenal gland which secretes NE & EP ----> signs of catecholamine excess eg. hypertension, tachycardia & arrhythmias)
Used in patients with pheochromocytoma (tumor of the adrenal gland which secretes NE & EP ----> signs of catecholamine excess eg. hypertension, tachycardia & arrhythmias)
b)
Carbidopa
-acts like methyldopa & blocks peripheral
dopa decarboxylase activity ----> decreased formation of dopamine (no effect
on NE)
-doesn't cross blood-brain barrier .: acts only peripherally
----> decreased side effects (motor symptoms) due to dopamine formation in peripheral tissues of patients with Parkinson's disease treated with L-dopa
-doesn't cross blood-brain barrier .: acts only peripherally
----> decreased side effects (motor symptoms) due to dopamine formation in peripheral tissues of patients with Parkinson's disease treated with L-dopa
ii)
Prevents storage
c)
Reserpine
-decreases storage of NE which leaks from
vesicles and is deaminated by MAO
-effects are decreased peripheral resistance, CO
and BP
-used in low doses with diuretics to treat mild
hypertension
-long duration of action
-not widely used
iii)
Inhibit release
d)
Guanethidine
-impairs the release of norepinephrine from
presynaptic sympathetic neurons
-doesn't cross blood-brain barrier
-taken up by nerve terminals and stored in
synaptic vesicles
-decreases release of NE in response to action
potentials or indirect acting sympathomimetics
-decreases response of α & α receptors
equally
.: decreases sympathetic tone to all organs
.: decreases sympathetic tone to all organs
Side
effects:
- Decreased BP, HR, & CO & postural hypotension
- Increased gut motility & diarrhea
- nasal stuffiness, impaired ejaculation
Use: because of side effects, only
used for moderate to severe hypertension
Definition: Postural or Orthostatic
hypotension is a fall in blood pressure associated with dizziness,
syncope and blurred vission occurring upon standing
e)Bretylium
-accumulates in
noradrenergic sympathetic neurons ----> decreased release of NE
-direct and indirect effects on the
heart
-used for IV treatment of ventricular dysrhythmias
-used for IV treatment of ventricular dysrhythmias
iv)
Reduction of central sympathetic flow
-drugs that decrease sympathetic outflow in the
CNS. Both activate α 2 receptors in the hypothalamus and medulla
----> decrease sympathetic outflow ----> decreased total peripheral
resistance, HR, CO ----> decrease BP
-no postural hypotension because they don't interfere with baroreceptor reflexes
-no postural hypotension because they don't interfere with baroreceptor reflexes
Types of α blockers:
- nonselective: eg. phenoxybenzamine and phentolamine (α 1 & α 2)
- selective: eg. prazosin (α 1)
Reversible
|
Irreversible
|
-may dissociate from receptor
-response varies with:
-eg. phentolamine
|
-don't dissociate from receptor
-response varies with:
-eg. phenoxybenzamine
|
Clinical Pharmacology:
- α receptors are present on vascular smooth
muscle
----> control arteriolar and venous tone
.: α 1 blockade ----> vasodilation ----> decreased peripheral resistance and BP
.: reflex sympathetic control of capacitance vessels is blocked
----> postural hypotension & reflex tachycardia
- α 2 blockade enhances this reflex tachycardia because the inhibitory effect on NE release is blocked
-more NE released to stimulate α1 receptors in the heart
----> control arteriolar and venous tone
.: α 1 blockade ----> vasodilation ----> decreased peripheral resistance and BP
.: reflex sympathetic control of capacitance vessels is blocked
----> postural hypotension & reflex tachycardia
- α 2 blockade enhances this reflex tachycardia because the inhibitory effect on NE release is blocked
-more NE released to stimulate α1 receptors in the heart
Major side effects of α blockers:
-related to decreased sympathetic tone at α -receptors
(due to α -blocking effect)
- postural hypotension
- reflex tachycardia
- inhibition of ejaculation
- nasal stuffiness
i) Phenoxybenzamine
-irreversible α 1&2 receptor
blockade
-binds covalently to receptor (14-48 hours
duration)
-blocks catecholamine-induced vasoconstriction
-used to diagnose & treat pheochromocytoma
(tumor of adrenal gland which secretes NE & EP ----> signs of
catecholamine excess eg. hypertension, tachycardia & arrhythmias
-also used to correct severe hypertension and
decrease blood volume before patient with pheochromocytoma undergoes surgery
-causes postural hypotension, tachycardia
-also acts centrally to cause nausea, vomiting,
sedation & weakness
ii) Phentolamine
-potent competitive reversible α 1&2
receptor blocker
-major clinical use in treatment of
pheochromocytoma
-used to treat episodes that occur during
surgical removal of tumor
-causes postural hypotension, tachycardia
-also stimulates gastrointestinal tract ---->
abdominal pain & diarrhea (not α blocking effect)
i)
Prazosin (Minipress) - (Antihypertensive)
-potent selective α 1 receptor
antagonist (reversible).
-causes dilation of both arterial & venous
smooth muscle
-effective in the management of chronic hypertension
-well absorbed orally but substantial first pass
metabolism
-only 50% available (T1/2=3-4 hrs)
-causes less tachycardia because α 2
receptors aren't blocked
-drugs which antagonize the effects of
catecholamines at α receptors
General characteristics of α blockers:
-all are pure antagonists (ie. no receptor
activation).
-those with higher affinity for α1
than α2 are important clinically.
-most resemble isoproterenol ( receptor agonist)

-most are well absorbed but low bioavailability
due to extensive hepatic metabolism (limited1/2)
-variable plasma concentration due to individual variations in metabolism
eg. decreased elimination in:
-variable plasma concentration due to individual variations in metabolism
eg. decreased elimination in:
- liver disease
- decreased blood flow to liver
- inhibition of liver enzymes
Effects and Clinical Uses:
- predictable from blockade of α adrenergic receptors
- important cardiovascular and opthalmic applications
a) Propranolol
-prototype α
blocking drug
-potent
reversible α1 and α2 receptor antagonist
-blocks +ve
chronotropic and inotropic effects on heart
-effects more
dramatic during exercise
Clinical Use: various
cardiovascular diseases (ie. hypertension, angina, dysrhythmia, postmyocardial
infarction etc.)
Side Effects:
-few in normal
individuals, can occur in disease states
-predictable
from α blockade
i) Patients with diabetes:
-propranol blocks metabolic
effects of α receptor stimulation (ie. inhibits increase in free fatty acids
and glycogenolysis)
.: can increase insulin-induced hypoglycemia
.: can increase insulin-induced hypoglycemia
ii) Patients with heart
disease:
-contraindicated
in patients with sinus bradycardia, partial heart block & congestive heart
failure
-CO depends on sympathetic output which is decreased with α blockers
-withdrawal symptoms (ie. angina, tachycardia, dysrhythmias) may develop after withdrawal from long term patients
-CO depends on sympathetic output which is decreased with α blockers
-withdrawal symptoms (ie. angina, tachycardia, dysrhythmias) may develop after withdrawal from long term patients
iii) Patients with asthma:
-α2
receptor blockade can ----> increase airway resistance
-selective α1 blockers should be used
-selective α1 blockers should be used
b) Timolol
-nonselective α
adrenergic blocker used orally for hypertension and angina, and topically for
the treatment of glaucoma
c) Selective α1 adrenergic blockers
(acebutolol, metoprolol, esmolol)
-are less likely to increase
bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma
-useful in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris
-useful in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris
Used in the treatment of:
a) Hypertension:
-decreased BP mainly due to effects on the heart
ie. -ve inotropic and chronotropic effects
b) Ischemic heart disease: eg. angina
-decreased angina and increased exercise
tolerance due to decreased cardiac work, decreased HR, & decreased oxygen demand
c) Cardiac arrhythmias
α1 blockade results in:
- decreased rate of spontaneous discharge of SA node
- decreased AV conduction
- decreased AV node refractory period
- decreased ventricular response to atrial flutter
- decreased ventricular or ectopic beats
Alpha1-adrenergic blockers
Definition
Alpha1-adrenergic blockers are drugs
that work by blocking the alpha1-receptors of vascular smooth
muscle, thus preventing the uptake of catecholamines by the smooth muscle
cells. This causes vasodilation and allows blood to flow more easily.
Purpose
These
drugs, called alpha blockers for short, are used for two main purposes: to
treat high blood pressure (hypertension) and to treat benign prostatic
hyperplasia (BPH), a condition that affects men and is characterized by an
enlarged prostate gland.
High blood pressure
High
blood pressure puts a strain on the heart and the arteries. Over time,
hypertension can damage the blood vessels to the point of causing stroke,
heart failure or kidney failure. People with high blood pressure may also be
at higher risk for heart attacks. Controlling high blood pressure makes these
problems less likely. Alpha blockers help lower blood pressure by causing
vasodilation, meaning an increase in the diameter of the blood vessels, which
allows blood to flow more easily.
|
|
Description
Commonly
prescribed alpha blockers for hypertension and BPH include doxazosin (Cardura,
prazosin (Minipress) and terazosin (Hytrin). Prazosin is also used in the
treatment of heart failure. All are available only with a physician's
prescription and are sold in tablet form.
Examples of alpha blockers
Alpha blockers include:
• Doxazosin
• Prazosin
• Phenoxybenzamine
• Phentolamine
• Tamsulosin
• Alfuzosin
• Terazosin
Tamsulosin is relatively selective for α1a-adrenergic
receptors, which are mainly present in the prostate. Hence, it may have a more
selective action in BPH with minimal effects on blood pressure.
Precautions
Alpha blockers may lower blood
pressure to a greater extent than desired. This can cause dizziness,
lightheadedness, heart palpitations, and fainting. Activities such as driving,
using machines, or doing anything else that might be dangerous for 24 hours
after taking the first dose should be avoided. Patients should be reminded to
be especially careful not to fall when getting up in the middle of the night.
The same precautions are recommended if the dosage is increased or if the drug
has been stopped and then started again. Anyone whose safety on the job could
be affected by taking alpha blockers should inform his or her physician, so
that the physician can take this factor into account when increasing dosage.
Some people may feel drowsy or less alert when
using these drugs. They should accordingly avoid driving or performing
activities that require full attention.
People diagnosed with kidney disease or liver
disease may also be more sensitive to alpha blockers. They should inform their
physicians about these conditions if alpha blockers are prescribed. Older
people may also be more sensitive and may be more likely to have unwanted side
effects, such as fainting, dizziness, and lightheadedness.
It should be noted that alpha blockers do not
cure high blood pressure. They simply help to keep the condition under control.
Similarly, these drugs will not shrink an enlarged prostate gland. Although
they will help relieve the symptoms of prostate enlargement, the prostate may
continue to grow, and it eventually may be necessary to have prostate surgery.
Alpha blockers may lower blood counts. Patients
may need to have their blood checked regularly while taking this medicine.
Anyone who has had unusual reactions to alpha
blockers in the past should let his or her physician know before taking the
drugs again. The physician should also be told about any allergies to foods,
dyes, preservatives, or other substances.
The effects of taking alpha blockers during
pregnancy are not fully understood. Women who are pregnant or planning to
become pregnant should inform their physicians. Breastfeeding mothers who need
to take alpha blockers should also talk to their physicians. These drugs can
pass into breast milk and may affect nursing babies. It may be necessary to
stop breastfeeding while being treated with alpha blockers.
Side effects
The most common side effects are
dizziness, drowsiness, tiredness, headache, nervousness, irritability, stuffy
or runny nose, nausea, pain in the arms and legs, and weakness. These problems
usually go away as the body adjusts to the drug and do not require medical
treatment. If they do not subside or if they interfere with normal activities,
the physician should be informed.
If any of the following side effects occur, the
prescribing physician should be notified as soon as possible:
·
fainting
·
shortness of breath or difficulty breathing
·
fast, pounding, or irregular heartbeat
·
swollen feet, ankles, wrists
Other side effects may occur. Anyone who has
unusual symptoms after taking alpha blockers should contact his or her
physician.
Interactions
Alpha blocker
These drugs may be used to treat:
- benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
- high blood pressure (hypertension). This is not typically the drug of choice unless the patient also has BPH.
- symptoms of non inflammatory chronic pelvic pain syndrome, a type of prostatitis. As a side effect they may reduce blood pressure and result in lightheadedness.
Adverse effects and interactions
By reducing α1-adrenergic
activity of the blood vessels, these drugs may cause hypotension and interrupt
the baroreflex response. In doing so, they may cause dizziness,
lightheadedness, or fainting when rising from a lying or sitting posture (known
as orthostatic hypotension or postural hypotension). For this reason, it is
generally recommended that alpha blockers should be taken at bedtime.
Additionally, the risk of orthostatic hypotension may be reduced by starting at
a low dose and titrating upwards as needed.
Because these medications may
cause orthostatic hypotension, as well as hypotension in general, these agents
may interact with other medications that increase risk for hypotension, such as
other antihypertensives and vasodilators.
As discussed above, tamsulosin
may have less risk for hypotension and orthostatic hypotension due to its
selectivity for α1a-adrenergic receptors. On the other hand, the
drug (a) elevates risk for floppy iris syndrome, and (b) might show ADRs
characteristic of the sulfa related drugs.
Doxazosin (Cardura) is not known
to interact with any other drugs. Terazosin (Hytrin) may interact with
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as ibuprofen (Motrin), and with
other blood pressure drugs, such as enalapril (Vasotec), and verapamil (Calan,Verelan).
Prazosin (Minipress) may interact with beta adrenergic blocking agents such as
propranolol (Inderal) and others, and with verapamil (Calan, Isoptin.) When
drugs interact, the effects of one or both of the drugs may change or the risk
of side effects may be greater.
• Doxazosin
• Prazosin
• Phenoxybenzamine
• Phentolamine
• Tamsulosin
• Alfuzosin
• Terazosin
Examples of alpha blockers
Alpha blockers include:
Tamsulosin is relatively
selective for α1a-adrenergic receptors, which are mainly present in
the prostate. Hence, it may have a more selective action in BPH with minimal
effects on blood pressure.
The physiological framework for understanding
hypertension: Ventriculo-arterial coupling
SV EaPressure 1 23 4 LVEDP EDPVRESP ESPVR = Emax =
Es
LVEDV
Volume
Key: 1 = End diastole, just prior to LV contraction. The
pressure at 1 is the left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and the
volume is the left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) (1 to 2 = isovolemic contraction) 2
= Opening of the aortic valve and beginning of ejection into the aorta (2 to 3 is the volume ejected from the LV
into the aorta which is the stroke volume (SV)) 3 = End systole.
The pressure at 3 is known as the end-systolic pressure (ESP). The aortic valve
shuts just after 3. (3 to 4 is isovolumic relaxation) 4
= Beginning of passive diastolic filling. 4 to 1 is diastolic filling along the dotted curve. This dotted
curve is the end-diastolic pressure volume relation
(EDPVR). ESPVR = End-systolic pressure volume
relation. This also called Emax or Es 

which stand for maximal elastance or elastance at
end-systole, respectively. This characterizes the strength of the LV irrespective of the
systolic load it faces. Ea = Effective arterial elastance. This is
characterizes the arterial tree and the load it presents to the LV during systole. Ea is
primarily determined by arterial resistance but arterial compliance effects it
too. Ea and ESPVR “Couple” to exactly
determine the stroke volume. In essence, the volume lost by one chamber is
exactly equal to the volume gained by the other. The elastance of each chamber
(heart and vascular tree) determines the pressure. The exact systolic and
diastolic pressures that obtain are dependent on arterial properties (Ea),
ventricular properties (ESPVR) and the filling state (LVEDV).
There are FOUR possible mechanisms for hypertension
1. The volume ejected from the LV can be too high. This could result
from an excessive contraction during systole (a very high ESPVR). This
mechanism is described in the medical literature but is not typical. A
hyperdynamic circulation is thought to play a role in the hypertension seen in
some young, otherwise fit African-American males.
2. The
intravascular volume may be too high causing an excess of venous return,
leading to an elevated LVEDV. The very full heart would then eject a large
volume into the arterial tree thus leading to hypertension. The high
intravascular volume could be caused by renal dysfunction with subsequent fluid
retention, or it could be due to exogenous administration. There does seem to
be a subset of patients that has an elevated intravascular volume Nevertheless,
the excessive intravascular volume mechanism appears to occur infrequently
since many newly diagnosed hypertensive patients actually have a contracted
intravascular volume. The excessive intravascular volume mechanism also
implies that the cardiac output would be elevated, but it is usually normal.
3. Excess
venous return could also occur even with a reduced intravascular volume if the venous
tone were significantly elevated. This would cause a rise in the LVEDV even
with a normal or low actual blood volume. Whether this
occurs as a regular feature of hypertension is not known.
4. The
effective arterial elastance (Ea) can be too high. This can occur either
because the resistance is too high or because the compliance is too low. Many
forms of hypertension are associated with an elevated arterial resistance.
Furthermore, in older humans, the arterial tree becomes stiffer and less
compliant. Thus, for a given stroke volume delivered into the arterial tree,
the pressure goes up, especially the systolic pressure.
Central
Sympatholytics

Centrally Acting
Sympatholytics
General
Pharmacology
The sympathetic adrenergic
nervous system plays a major role in the regulation of arterial pressure.
Activation of these nerves to the heart increases the heart rate (positive
chronotropy), contractility (positive inotropy) and velocity of electrical
impulse conduction (positive dromotropy). The norepinephrine-releasing,
sympathetic adrenergic
nerves that innervate the heart
and blood vessels are postganglionic efferent nerves whose cell bodies
originate in prevertebral and paraveterbral sympathetic ganglia. Preganglionic
sympathetic fibers, which travel from the spinal cord to the ganglia, originate
in the medulla of the brainstem. Within the medulla are located sympathetic
excitatory neurons that have significant basal activity, which generates a
level of sympathetic tone to the heart and vasculature even under basal
conditions. The sympathetic neurons within the medulla receive input from other
neurons within the medulla (e.g., vagal neurons), from the nucleus tractus
solitarius (receives input from peripheral baroreceptors and chemoreceptors),
and from neurons located in the hypothalamus. Together, these neuronal systems
regulate sympathetic (and parasympathetic) outflow to the heart and
vasculature.
Sympatholytic drugs can block
this sympathetic adrenergic system are three different levels. First, peripheral
sympatholytic drugs such as alpha-adrenoceptor and beta-adrenoceptor
antagonists block the influence of norepinephrine at the effector organ (heart
or blood vessel). Second, there are ganglionic blockers that block
impulse transmission at the sympathetic ganglia. Third, there are drugs that
block sympathetic activity within the brain. These are called centrally
acting sympatholytic drugs.
Centrally acting sympatholytics
block sympathetic activity by binding to and activating alpha2 (α2)-adrenoceptors.
This reduces sympathetic outflow to the heart thereby decreasing cardiac output
by decreasing heart rate and contractility. Reduced sympathetic output to the
vasculature decreases sympathetic vascular tone, which causes vasodilation and
reduced systemic vascular resistance, which decreases arterial pressure.
Therapeutic
Indications
Centrally acting α2-adrenoceptor
agonists are used in the treatment of hypertension. However, they are not
considered first-line therapy in large part because of side effects that are
associated with their actions within the brain. They are usually administered
in combination with a diuretic to prevent fluid accumulation, which increases
blood volume and compromises the blood pressure lowering effect of the drugs.
Fluid accumulation can also lead to edema. Centrally acting α2-adrenoceptor
agonists are effective in hypertensive patients with renal disease because they
do not compromise renal function.
Specific
Drugs
Several different centrally acting α2-adrenoceptor
agonists are available for clinical use:
·
Clonidine
·
Guanabenz
·
Guanfacine
·
α-methyldopa
Clonidine, guanabenz and
guanfacine are structurally related compounds and have similar antihypertensive
profiles. α-methyldopa is a structural analog of dopa and functions as a
prodrug. After administration, α-methyldopa is converted to
α-methynorepinephrine, which then serves as the α2-adrenoceptor
agonist in the medulla to decrease sympathetic outflow.
Side
Effects and Contraindications
Side effects of centrally acting
α2-adrenoceptor agonists include sedation, dry mouth and nasal
mucosa, bradycardia (because of increased vagal stimulation of the SA node as
well as sympathetic withdrawal), orthostatic hypotension, and impotence.
Constipation, nausea and gastric upset are also associated with the
sympatholytic effects of these drugs. Fluid retention and edema is also a
problem with chronic therapy; therefore, concurrent therapy with a diuretic is
necessary. Sudden discontinuation of clonidine can lead to rebound hypertension,
which results from excessive sympathetic activity.
Methyldopa
Systematic (IUPAC) name
2-amino-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-methyl-propanoic acid Chemical data Formula
C10H13NO4
Mol. Mass 211.215 g/mol
Pharmacokinetic
data
Bioavailability
approximately 50%
Metabolism Hepatic
Half
life 105 minutes
Excretion Renal for metabolites
Therapeutic
considerations Pregnancy cat.
Routes Oral, IV
Methyldopa or alpha-methyldopa is a
centrally-acting adrenergic antihypertensive medication. Its use is now
deprecated following introduction of alternative safer classes of agents.
However it continues to have a role in otherwise difficult to treat
hypertension and pregnancy-induced hypertension.
Mechanism of action
Methyldopa has
variable absorption from the gut of approximately 50%. It is metabolized in the
intestines and liver; its metabolite alpha-methylnorepineprine acts in the
brain to stimulate alpha-adrenergic receptors decreasing total peripheral
resistance. It is excreted in urine.
Methyldopa, in its active
metabolite form, leads to increased alpha-2 receptor-mediated inhibition of SNS
(centrally and peripherally), allowing PSNS tone to increase. Such activity
leads to a decrease in total peripheral resistance (TPR) and cardiac output.
If methyldopa is abruptly
withdrawn, rebound hypertension happens. This results because the long term use
of methyldopa lowers the sensitivity of presynaptic alpha 2 receptors: the
release of norepinephrine (NE) from sympathetic nerve endings is modulated by
NE itself acting on the presynaptic alpha 2 autoreceptors thus inhibiting its
own release. The discontinuation of methyldopa removes the inhibition on NE
release leading to excessive NE release from the SNS and the rebound
hyertension.
Side effects
There are many possible reported side-effects
with some, whilst rare, being serious. Side effects are usually fewer if the
dose is less than 1 g per day:
• Gastro-intestinal
disturbances
• Dry
mouth
• Bradycardia
(slow pulse rate)
• Worsening
of angina
• Orthostatic
hypotension (Postural hypotension)
• Sedation,
headaches, dizziness
• Myalgia
(muscle pain), arthralgia (joint pain) or paraesthesia (numbness)
• Nightmares,
mild psychosis, depression
• Parkinsonism,
Bell's palsy
• Abnormal
liver functions tests and hepatitis
• Pancreatitis
• Haemolytic
anaemia
• Bone
marrow suppresion leading to
thrombocytopenia (low platelets) or leucopenia (low white blood cells)
• Hypersensitivity
reactions including lupus erythematosus-like syndrome, myocarditis (heart
muscle inflammation), pericarditis and rashes
• Ejaculatory
failure, Impotence, decreased libido, gynecomastia (breast enlargement in men),
hyperprolactinaemia and amenorrhoea
Central sympatholytics
Interactions
OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacokinetic
and pharmacodynamic interactions between antipsychotics and antihypertensive
and to provide recommendations for the selection of antihypertensive in
patients receiving antipsychotic therapy
SYNTHESIS:
Because hypertension is common in patients with psychiatric illness and
antihypertensive agents are used for a multiplicity of indications, significant
numbers of patients receive concurrent therapy with antihypertensives and
antipsychotics. Many antipsychotics may block the antihypertensive efficacy of
guanethidine and related drugs. The interaction between clonidine and
antipsychotics is defined less clearly. Limited data suggest possible additive
hypotensive effects when chlorpromazine and methyldopa are given in
combination. Increased plasma concentrations of thioridazine with a resultant
increase in adverse effects have been reported when propranolol or pindolol are
added to the regimen. A similar increase in chlorpromazine concentrations has
been reported when propranolol was added. Although there are no reports
documenting an interaction between a calcium-channel antagonist and an
antipsychotic, the possible inhibition of oxidative metabolism of
antipsychotics, additive calcium-blocking activity, and additive
pharmacodynamic effects are theorized. Hypotension and postural syncope were
reported in a patient given therapeutic dosages of chlorpromazine and captopril,
and in 2 patients when clozapine was added to enalapril therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: No
antipsychotic-antihypertensive combination is absolutely contraindicated, but
no combination should be considered to be completely without risk.
Antihypertensives with no centrally acting activity, such as diuretics, may be
the least likely to result in adverse reactions. The combination of the
beta-antagonists propranolol or pindolol with thioridazine or chlorpromazine
should be avoided if possible. Scrupulous patient monitoring for attenuated or
enhanced activity of either agent is essential whenever antipsychotics and
antihypertensives are given concurrently
Clonidine
Clonidine
|
|
Systematic (IUPAC) name
|
|
N-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-amine
|
|
Chemical data
|
|
Formula
|
|
Mol. mass
|
230.093 g/mol
|
Pharmacokinetic data
|
|
Bioavailability
|
75-95%
|
Protein binding
|
20-40%
|
Metabolism
|
Hepatic to inactive metabolites
|
Half life
|
12-16 hours
|
Excretion
|
?
|
Therapeutic considerations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Routes
|
oral, transdermal
|
Mechanism of action
Clonidine is a
direct-acting adrenergic agonist prescribed historically as an
anti-hypertensive agent. It has found new uses, including treatment of some
types of neuropathic pain, opioid detoxification, sleep hyperhydrosis, and,
off-label, to counter the side effects of stimulant medications such as
methylphenidate or Adderall. It is becoming a more accepted treatment for
insomnia because clonidine is less addictive than most prescription sleep aids.
Clonidine is increasingly used in conjunction with stimulants to treat
attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), where it's given in late
afternoon and/or evening for sleep, and because it sometimes helps moderate
ADHD-associated impulsive and oppositional behavior, and may reduce tics.[1] Clonidine
can also be used in the treatment of Tourette syndrome.
Clonidine for opiate withdrawals
Clonidine is a
centrally-acting alpha-2 agonist. It selectively stimulates receptors in the
brain that monitor catecholamine levels in the blood. These receptors close a
negative feedback loop that begins with descending sympathetic nerves from the
brain that control the production of catecholamines (epinephrine, also known as
adrenaline, and norepinephrine) in the adrenal medulla. By fooling the brain
into believing that catecholamine levels are higher than they really are,
clonidine causes the brain to reduce its signals to the adrenal medulla, which
in turn lowers catecholamine production and blood levels. The result is a
lowered heart rate and blood pressure, with side effects of dry mouth and
fatigue. If clonidine is suddenly withdrawn the sympathetic nervous system will
revert to producing high levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine, higher even
than before treatment, causing rebound hypertension. Rebound hypertension can
be avoided by slowly withdrawing treatment.
Clonidine is
regularly prescribed to opiate addicts to help alleviate their withdrawals. It
is mainly used to combat the sympathetic response to opiate
withdrawal,(tachycardia and hypertension) in the first couple days of
withdrawals. It helps take away the sweating, hot/cold flashes, and general
restlessness. The sedation effect is also useful.
Administration
Clonidine is
typically available as tablets as a transdermal patch ,or as an injectable form
to be given epidurally, directly to the central nervous system.
Reserpine
Reserpine
|
|
Systematic (IUPAC) name
|
|
methyl-11,17α-dimethoxy-18β-[(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl)
oxy]-3β,20α-yohimban-16β-carboxylate
|
|
Chemical data
|
|
Formula
|
|
Mol. mass
|
608.679 g/mol
|
Pharmacokinetic data
|
|
Bioavailability
|
50%
|
Metabolism
|
gut/liver
|
Half life
|
phase 1 = 4.5h,
phase 2 = 271h, average = 33h |
Excretion
|
62% feces / 8% urine
|
Therapeutic considerations
|
|
Pregnancy cat.
|
D
(fetotoxic)
|
Legal status
|
Rx-only
(some countries banned/discontinued)
|
Routes
|
oral
|
•Reserpine is an indole alkaloidantipsychotic and
antihypertensive drug known to irreversibly bind to storage vesicles of
neurotransmitters such as dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin.Reserpine
depletion of monoamine neurotransmitters in the synapses is often used to
bolster the theory that depletion of the neurotransmitters causes subsequent
depression in humans. Moreover, reserpine has a peripheral action in many parts
of the body, resulting in a preponderance of the cholinergic part of the
nervous system (GI-Tract, smooth muscles vessels).Reserpine has been discontinued
in the UK
for some years due to its vast interactions and side effects.
Uses today
In some countries reserpine is
still available as part of combination drugs for the treatment of hypertension, in most cases they contain also a
diuretic and/or a vasodilator like hydralazine. These combinations are
currently regarded as second choice drugs. The daily dose of reserpine in
antihypertensive treatment is as low as 0.1 to 0.25mg. The use of reserpine as
an antipsychotic drug has been nearly completely abandoned. Originally, doses
of 0.5mg to 40mg daily were used to treat psychotic diseases. Doses in excess
of 3mg daily often required use of an anticholinergic drug to combat excessive
cholinergic activity in many parts of the body as well as parkinsonism. Reserpine
may be used as a sedative for horses.
Side effects
Reserpine has a narrow
therapeutic index and a multitude of side-effects, including: Nausea,
vomiting, weight gain, gastric intolerance, gastric ulceration (due to
increased cholinergic activity in gastric tissue and impaired mucosal
quality), stomach cramps and diarrhea are noted. The drug causes hypotension
and bradycardia and may worsen asthma. Congested nose is another consequence
of alpha-blockade. Depression does occur and may be severe enough to lead to
suicide. Other central effects are a high incidence of drowsiness, dizziness,
and nightmares. Parkinsonism occurs in a dose dependent manner. General
weakness or fatigue is quite often encountered. High dose studies in rodents
found reserpine to cause fibroadenoma of the breast and malignant tumors of
the semen vesicles among others. Early suggestions that reserpine causes
breast cancer in women (risk approximately doubled) were not confirmed.
|
|
|
Vasodilators
Definition
Vasodilators are medicines that
act directly on muscles in blood vessel walls to make blood vessels widen
(dilate).
Purpose
Vasodilators are used to treat
high blood pressure (hypertension). By widening the arteries, these drugs allow
blood to flow through more easily, reducing blood pressure. Controlling high
blood pressure is important because the condition puts a burden on the heart
and the arteries, which can lead to permanent damage over time. If untreated,
high blood pressure increases the risk of heart attack, heart failure, stroke,
or kidney failure. Vasodilators usually are prescribed with other types of
blood pressure drugs and rarely are used alone.
Description
Examples of vasodilators are
hydralazine (Apresoline) and minoxidil (Loniten). The vasodilator hydralazine
also may be used to control high blood pressure in pregnant women or to bring
down extremely high blood pressure in emergency situations. In the forms used
for treating high blood pressure (tablets or injections), these drugs are
available only with a physician's prescription. A liquid form of minoxidil,
used to promote hair growth in people with certain kinds of baldness and is
applied directly to the scalp, and is sold without a prescription.
Precautions
Seeing a physician regularly
while taking a vasodilator is important, especially during the first few
months. The physician will check to make sure the medicine is working as it
should and will watch for unwanted side effects. People who have high blood
pressure often feel fine. But even when they feel well, patients should keep
seeing their physicians and taking their medicine.
Vasodilators will not cure high
blood pressure, but will help control the condition. To avoid the serious
health problems that high blood pressure can cause, patients may have to take medicine
for the rest of their lives. Furthermore, medicine alone may not be enough.
People with high blood pressure also may need to avoid certain foods and keep
their weight under control. The health care professional who is treating the
condition can offer advice on what measures may be necessary.
Some people feel dizzy or have
headaches while using this medicine. These problems are especially likely to
occur in older people, who are more sensitive than younger people to the
medicine's effects. Anyone who takes these drugs should not drive, use
machines, or do anything else that might be dangerous until they know how the
drugs affect them.
Vasodilators
interaction.
Interactions of cAMP-mediated vasodilators with angiotensin II in rat kidney during hypertension
In previous studies reported
that vasodilator prostaglandins (PGs) are defective in buffering the
angiotensin II (ANG II)-induced vasoconstriction in the renal vasculature
of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). The purpose of the present
study was to determine whether this defect in SHR kidneys is specific
to PGs or generalized to the action of vasodilators and to gain insight
into which intracellular signal(s) mediates this abnormality. Renal blood
flow (RBF; electromagnetic flowmetry) was measured in 7 wk-old anesthetized,
euvolemic SHR and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats pretreated
with indomethacin to avoid interactions with endogenous PGs. ANG II
(2 ng) was injected into the renal artery before and during continuous intrarenal
infusion of fenoldopam [DA1 receptor agonist and G protein-dependent
stimulator of adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP)],
forskolin (G protein-independent stimulator of cAMP), dibutyryl-cAMP
(soluble cAMP), and acetylcholine (cGMP stimulator). Each vasodilator
was infused at a low dose that did not affect baseline arterial pressure
or RBF. In the control period, ANG II reduced RBF by 50% in both strains.
Infusion of fenoldopam significantly blunted the ANG II-induced vasoconstriction
in WKY, but not in SHR. In contrast, forskolin, dibutyryl-cAMP, and
acetylcholine effectively buffered the vasoconstriction due to ANG
II in both SHR and WKY. These results suggest that renal vasodilators
acting through receptor binding to stimulate the cAMP signaling
pathway are ineffective in counteracting the ANG II-induced vasoconstriction
in SHR kidneys.
Statins
Stains are also
the drug of choice in the treatment of Hypertension by lowering the blood
pressure.
Statin therapy is undoubtedly the
single most important risk factor intervention beyond blood pressure reduction.
In the ASCOT Lipid Lowering Arm ,reductions in coronary events were apparent at
30 days and significant within 3 months. The National Cholesterol Education
Program guidelines introduced a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c)
target of 1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) for very high-risk patients, alongside a target
of 2.5 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) for high-risk patients. Two recent trials suggest
that intensive compared with moderate lipid lowering, and the lower LDL-c
target, may be appropriate for all patients with CAD. The Treating to New
Targets (TNT) [28••] study randomly assigned 10 000 patients with stable CAD to
receive 80 mg or 10 mg of atorvastatin daily, lowering mean LDL-c to 2.0 mmol/l
and 2.6 mmol/l, respectively. Major cardiovascular events, the primary outcome,
were significantly reduced by 22% (0.78 [0.69–0.89], P < 0.001). Similar
benefits occurred in the broader composite outcomes of any cardiovascular or
any coronary event. Results were tempered by a nonsignificant increase in
noncardiovascular deaths, however, leading to a call for further reassurance as
to the safety of atorvastatin 80 mg/day .
Concerns regarding safety were
lessened by the recent Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive
Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) study [30•]. Nearly 9000 patients with a previous
myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to receive high-dose atorvastatin
80 mg/day or usual-dose simvastatin 20 mg/day, reducing mean LDL-c to 2.1
mmol/l and 2.7 mmol/l, respectively. The aggressive lipid lowering failed to
achieve a significant reduction in the primary outcome, defined as coronary
death, myocardial infarction, or resuscitated cardiac arrest (0.89 [0.78–1.01],
P = 0.07). Risk of major cardiovascular events including stroke, the primary
outcome in the TNT study, however, was significantly reduced by 13% (0.87
[0.77–0.98], P = 0.02). More importantly, no excess of noncardiovascular deaths
was observed in the atorvastatin group, In both, serious myopathy and
rhabdomyolysis were rare and of similar frequency in each treatment group.
Patients
receiving high-dose atorvastatin had more nonserious adverse events resulting
in drug discontinuation, including persistent transaminase elevation (about
1.0%).
The importance
of LDL-c lowering was highlighted by the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT)
Collaborators' meta-analysis [31] of 14 trials involving 90 000 patients.
Statin therapy reduced coronary mortality, revascularization, myocardial
infarction, and stroke by about 20% per 1 mmol/l decrement in LDL-c, with a
corresponding 12% proportional reduction in all-cause mortality. Benefits were
consistent in all subgroups including patients with hypertension, pretreatment
LDL-c less than 2.6 mmol/l, and even LDL-c less than 2.0 mmol/l. Absolute
benefit was determined by the absolute risk of events and the absolute
reduction in LDL-c achieved. Thus the overall risk reduction of about 20% per
mmol/l LDL-c reduction translated into 48 fewer patients having major cardiovascular
events per 1000 among those with preexisting CAD, compared with 25
per 1000 among patients with no
such history. Rather than achieving specific target levels, the goal should be
substantial absolute reductions in LDL-c, irrespective of baseline cholesterol.
We tried to get pregnant for a few years in a local clinic. There were no results. We've tried everything possible but nothing. We were recommended to use eggs. I know we have to go abroad. I was terrified. I didn't know where to go and where to begin my search. When my friend recommended Dr Itua to me from western Africa I thought she was joking. I knew nothing about that country but I well know they have powerful gifts on herbal medicines and I was afraid because of the language barrier. Anyway she convinced me to give a try. She told me that Dr Itua can also cure my prostate cancer which gives me more motivation to give a try to Dr Itua herbal center medicines. I've done the research and thought that maybe this really is a good idea. Dr Itua has reasonable prices which I ordered two four bottles and I drank it as instructed and everything went well. My prostate cancer is gone. Also it has high rates of successful treatments. Plus it uses natural herbs. Well I should say I was convinced. We contacted Dr Itua and now we can say it was the best decision in our lives. We were trying for so long to have a child and suddenly it all looked so simple. Dr Itua was so confident and hopeful he projected those feelings on me too. I am so happy to be a mother and eternally thankful to Dr Itua herbal Cure . Don’t be afraid and just do it!
ReplyDeleteDr Itua can cure the following diseases:Sickle Cell,Hiv,Herpes,Shingles, Hepatitis B,Liver Inflammatory,Diabetes,Fibroid,Parkinson's,Alzheimer’s disease,Bechet’s disease,Crohn’s disease,Lupus,Hpv,Weak Erection,Infertility,fibromyalgia,Chronic Diarrhea,Get Your Ex Back,Als,SYPHILIS,Cancer,Autism,Genetic disease,Epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, Doctor Itua Contact Email: drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com Or Whats-App Chat : +2348149277967